And learn from our past.
Could the terrible loss of life and environmental destruction that was World War
II been prevented? If we don‘t learn from our past, we are bound to repeat our
mistakes; honouring the battle of D-Day and the men who lost their lives should include answering the question, “how could it have been prevented?”
My aunt lost two sons in the
war; she spent almost a decade in mourning. She spoke resentfully of people who
got rich during the war while she lost her children.
So as the US and Russia face
off over the Ukraine, what could we learn from World War II?
When someone, a leader or a
country says that it wants world domination or implies that it is somehow
“above the law”, they mean it! Hitler said it. Now the US says it.
US
exceptionalism was recognized as fact in the eighteenth century; unfortunately
the more recent US leadership have mistaken exceptionalism for superiority. Paul Bolt, on taking his position as US representative to the UN said (and I
paraphrase) that there wasn’t really a United Nations, the world was governed
by one super-power and everyone else had to go along. In fact, the failure to
understand the nature of US exceptionalism has lead to universal blindness
about the invasions and bombings of more than seven different countries in the
last century, the building of military bases in more than 25 countries, the
surrounding of China, Russia and the Korean Peninsula – and acceptance of US
hegemony at the security counsel. Finally, the United States does believe that
it is above the law; it does not accept the existence of the International
Criminal Court.
The US wealthy need to keep
having wars. They even support the use of drones so the sales of arms will continue but US citizens don’t actually
have to get killed. Obama has made threats
to Iran, Syria and now Russia – none of which have threatened the US. So the US
is on a war path.
Why do we (the rest of the
world) stand silent?
1. Denial: We can’t believe that the world would go to
war. Chamberlain so wanted to believe Hitler that he called the “Munich
Agreement” of 1938 which “gave” Czechoslovakia to Hitler, a “Peace agreement”.
We can’t believe that there
would be unscrupulous people in the arms industry who would lobby for war for
their own profit – of course, that’s not what they say. They say that the war is for “education for
the woman”, saving “babies from being thrown out of their incubators” or “to
establish democracy”.
We can’t believe that the
sales of arms is ethical; we can’t conceive that people have no responsibility
for arming terrorists, underground militia, or despotic governments – or for
the people killed by the arms from which they profited.
2. Personal Gain: This
played a role in the delay with which the US entered WWII. It plays a role
among nations currently allied with the US; disagreeing with the US might mean
imposition of some new sanctions, some passport hassle or trade issue. Additionally,
of course, other countries may have arms industries equally eager to see a war
break out. Canada could become very wealthy if a major war occurred in Eastern
Europe.
3. Bad-mouthing the US: No
one wants to be labeled as “anti-American” partly because the term “American”
is equally applicable to Mexicans, Central and South Americans and partly
because mostly we like the citizens of the United States even as their
government doesn’t represent them on the world stage.
Even so, the United States
is behaving like a big bully; it must accept the same rules as everyone else. Why
is it in the Ukraine in the first place? Why is it leading the inflammatory
remarks towards Russia? Become civilized and behaviour as civilized adults and
start negotiating a peace process.
The fact that Russia and the
United States both have nuclear weapons means that no one will be left unaffected if war occurs - we cannot afford to just watch the process - we need to be vocal.
No comments:
Post a Comment